Allocate retrofit capital where it protects the most value.
A ranked retrofit programme across the portfolio that gives you capex, payback, EPC rating impact, and a working sequence for the projects. It is built for the decision an investment committee actually has to make rather than the one a strategy deck pretends to.
Where you are
You have finite capex, real retrofit pressure, and a long list of possible works that has not yet been ranked against itself.
The decision in front of you
Where does retrofit capital create, protect, or preserve the most value across the portfolio?
Why the usual routes do not get you there
- Consultancy options appraisals are slow, work asset by asset, and rarely compare any one option against the alternatives.
- Spreadsheet scoring relies on assumptions that nobody really wants to defend in writing.
- Reactive maintenance budgets quietly fund the loudest project rather than the highest-impact one.
- Cheap measures with strong payback go missing because they never show up on the list of visible projects.
What we do instead
We compare every viable measure on every asset by capex, savings, payback, EPC movement, carbon impact, and marginal abatement cost, and then sequence those measures into a programme that respects lease events, capex cycles, and compliance deadlines.
What lands on your desk
- A ranked retrofit programme across the portfolio
- Capex, payback, and rating impact for every measure
- A scenario comparison led by budget, deadline, or ROI
- An IC-ready PDF and underlying data export
- A year-by-year sequenced roadmap
Why it holds up under scrutiny
Every output rolls up from measure-level estimates that each carry a confidence level. The model is documented on the methodology page, the assumptions are visible, the alternatives are directly comparable, and the resulting decision is auditable when somebody asks.
Ready to test this with your portfolio?
Request access now and upload your addresses to see a complete portfolio plan.